As you all know from my last post , Irene Ng was been drawn into a war of worlds with netizen , leaving her exposed to further flakes from netizens and certain segment of public.
However i would like to point out certain flaws in her argument. Firstly UK MPs are generally Full-time , last i heard she was a full-time writer in residence. So where is her passion to serve?.
Unless her passion is for her dual salary , yet perhaps not giving as much commitment as a UK MP? no wonder she need to be more “hardworking”
Next she compare the allowance given , but she fail to mention the higher cost of living in the uk. So i wonder is her education at London School Of Economics in vain?
What about the Number of people she serve in her constituency VS the number a average UK MP serve. The scrutiny they faced by the horrendous british tabloid . To be frank does she really have the mandate of the people she serve? if she does i politely invite her to request and run as a single-ward MP and not part of an GRC
Perhaps i have been in the states for too long , but please enlighten me on the average salary of a senior manager again?
But oh well let wait for the usually People Action Party , damage control to set in and explain this for her with their usual SOP(my opinion).
Sorry this is taken it out of context
Then delete it
Finally blame on some assistant or friend
unbiasedelectorate 
UB
Would opine that you are as unbiased as liberal Democrat in San Francisco
Frankly, she is just stating facts and in all things involving remuneration, it is a matter of packaging,
The MP”s pay applies to all and no differentiation, so what is this, further, the mainstay Mr Low Thia Khiang and Mr Chiam See Tong had continued their practice.
Now, for extra pork barrel and gerrymandering, in the US, I believe in certain electorals districts, there are constant changes to ensure carveouts, so frankly, the US can keep its own pro and cons and likewise the Singapore electorate where at least all get to vote inclusive of criminals.
I believe in USA, only 45% of total voting population votes.
whack the non-performance
Actually if you notice her style of writing , she did that to shine certain spotlight to show a good contrast.
Im just stating the flipside of the comtrast